Alderman Shane Keating

My views on funding of Recreation Centers

2012-02-02T12:11:00.000-07:00

Potential Funding Options

To Build the Four Proposed

Recreation Centres in Calgary

December 5, 2011

Alderman Shane Keating

Ward 12

Following the recent, and unfortunate, decision via PPP Canada to deny the City of Calgary’s funding application for the creation of four recreation centers in Calgary, the need to move forward is paramount.

There are a number of avenues that can be investigated to accomplish the goal of ensuring that recreation centers are a reality for the hundreds of thousands of Calgarians that would make use of these facilities.

With the removal of the PPP Canada option, the City of Calgary must do what it can to ensure that the commitment which made to Calgarians, to provide recreation options to the more that 84,000 children, and their families, in Seton, Quarry Park, Northwest Calgary and Great Plains.

The city has funds dedicated for recreation from the Municipal Sustainability Initiate which were part of the original funding schedule attached to PPP Canada application.

These funds are still available to be used towards the recreation centers. An innovative approach to using the currently available funds, combined with one or more of the following funding options will result in satisfying the needs of Calgarians.

Currently through MSI funding, there is $150 million available to go towards recreation.

Current MSI funding allocated

Seton $70 million
Quarry Park
Northwest Regional $70 million
Great Plains $10 million

The remaining amount would need to come from one, or a combination, of the following sources.

Funding Sources Potential Available Funding

Community Investment Reserve
Acreage Assessments Levies
Debt Financing
Private Funding
Fundraising

In the spirit of moving forward immediately, I have proposed to Administration for their views on how to proceed, using a combination of the above options but not limited too.

.
Fundraising

A potential option to accompany the funds dedicated through MSI and, or, any combination of tax room and reserve fund contributes would be a fundraising component.

Not-for-profit groups such as SECRS exist that could fundraise with the intent of supporting the costs of building a particular site(s).

If each potential centre had a non-profit organization stewarding the fundraising efforts, the community investment would be high which may offset other financing needs.

For-Profit Recreational Organizations

Another opportunity exists where for-profit sports organizations could attach themselves to a particular site and operate as a particular component of the center, for example, Ice or hockey organizations, fitness providers, tennis facilities and other specialized or for-profit outfits that may have an interest.

Private Corporation Funding

The support of Corporate groups with an interest of providing recreation services within the centers that might provide funds required to underwrite the construction.

My personal thoughts in memory of Jason Letourneau

2012-01-18T14:56:00.000-07:00

It has been 8 days since Jason’s passing. It is very difficult to begin when the one I am writing about usually sat across the desk from me. Having given myself time to reflect, I am now able to write about him.

We would start by defining the topic, and then writing a few main points, bounce around positions. Then I would write and Jason would take my chicken scratch and form a document clear, concise and would resonate with the reader.

With Jason I believed in this saying “Surround yourself with individuals better than you and success will be easy”, Jason certainly fit that role.

In the two years I worked with Jason a friendship grew from respect and admiration of talents and integrity which defined him. Despite the hardships and roadblocks Jason encountered, he did not falter, just planned a road around them.

It was approximately 6 months after we met that I found out he had had a heart transplant. Jason was explaining that he would have to miss work to see the doctor for a check-up.

Discovering another commonality, I had a niece who also worked at City Hall; she did not live long enough to receive a lung transplant. Jason was always open and honest about his health issues, he never expected or wanted any special treatment, although, he would do his utmost to ensure anyone who needed help would receive it.

Jason can rest knowing that one of his many original ideas has lived on. During discussions of the South East LRT, branding as an idea helps all understand and identify the concept. Jason was able to bring “SETWAY” to birth and it has stuck. Attesting to his creative side, along with the song “Those Rings” he had recorded which may be purchased at ITunes.

Jason was a great example of how City Hall is changing. There is a greater presence of social media and open communication. Jason was a great wizard in this area, teaching this old dog a few new tricks. Jason was an integral part of shaping a new way of thinking, creating a better Calgary, not just our area Ward 12. Our office worked as one without the worry of stepping on toes, a true sense of “team”.

We were joking one day and Jason said “Yes master I am your servant” I quickly replied “Oh No! You are my Dobby and I will never give you socks”. Jason had not seen the movie Harry Potter so did not know the meaning of my statement. We then spent the next 20 minutes watching YouTube clips of Dobby laughing the entire time. I believe Jason also knew he was neither a servant nor slave, but a confidant and equal. Often we would chat about a topic not sure how to interpret the situation, Jason’s response was always “Trust your gut”. That is why Jason worked with me, because I trusted my gut and knew Jason was an exceptional individual.

Calgary, City Hall, Ward 12 and I have lost a great advocate and true friend.

Merry Christmas

2011-12-23T10:32:00.000-07:00

With 2011 quickly winding down and the holiday season approaching I would like to wish everyone a very happy, healthy and Merry Christmas.

2011 was a very exciting year for Calgary. Many things were accomplished for the residents of Ward 12 and work is in high gear to ensure that Recreation Centers and the SETWAY remain high on the agenda for 2012.

I look forward to working with you over the next year on the issues that are important to you and all Calgarians.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Shane Keating
Alderman of Ward 12

SETWAY Pre-design Study - Public Information Sessions

2011-12-13T15:26:00.000-07:00

The City of Calgary is planning to hold three Public Information Sessions from January 24 – 26. These sessions will include a series of information boards/panels that citizens can read and study, and then have opportunity to ask questions or make comments to the various project team members in attendance.

The feedback that the City receives will be incorporated into the study's reports.

Here are the confirmed dates, times and locations for these public sessions.

January 24, 2012	Riverbend Community Hall	19 Rivervalley Drive SE	4 – 8 pm
January 25, 2012	Ramsay Community Hall	1136 – 8 Street SE	4 – 8 pm
January 26, 2012	McKenzie Towne Hall	40 McKenzie Towne Blvd SE	4 – 8 pm

A leader of tomorrow

2011-12-06T16:35:00.002-07:00

A little while ago I received a letter from a remarkable young man, Devon Findlater.

Devon's note to my office focussed on the Occupy Calgary issue that has drawn on in Calgary for many weeks.

To receive a impassioned letter from this young constituent showing an interest in what goes on in his City was enlightening.. I wanted to share with you, with his permission, his letter.

It is quite fitting to be able to meet this young man on the day that the decision by Chief Justice Wittmann on Occupy Calgary was made.
_________________________________________________________________________________

From: Devon Findlater
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:30 PM
To: Ward 12 Contact
Subject: Issue

Dear Mister Keating,

My name is Devon, a student that currently lives within your ward. I am writing you to express my, aswell as many of my friend's, and family's concerns with this "Occupy Calgary". Now, since I was much smaller I had a vested interest in Politics. And as such I do like to keep up to date on affairs. That being said, for the four now, I believe weeks, that these protesters have been at St. Patricks Island, and Olympic Plaza it has been sturring much media attention, but I want you to know a fourteen year old's simple views on this topic.

I believe simply it is a disgrace of a show. These "squatters", as many call it, are nothing but an annoyance to many people. They are protesting capitalists, and corporate greed but as I know it, capitalists get up at 6:00AM to get ready for work, leave at 7:00AM, and are already working until 6:00PM. From what you see at olypmic plaza, when you drive by they are not even awake at twelve noon! On the other note, Corporate greed is a real thing, in Wall-Steet. But in all reality saying those that make over 500,000 a year and own large companies are all greedy is not even truthful. My father owns a rather good sized national company himself, and we make a rather good amount, but that is not to say he is greedy. It is like saying every muslim is a terrorist, or every black woman is sassy. It is simply not true!

I would please hope you read this and bring some back bone to the council, I know McGiver would have done something, and I hope you can also share this if possible with a fellow councilman or two if possible, to show it is not only the old men that have opinions and are opposed to this, but even a mere child!

Regards,

D.C. Findlater, Esq.

2012 Business Plan & Budget Debates

2011-11-30T11:51:00.003-07:00

The following are two speeches that I presented during the recent 2012 Business Plan and Budget Debates.

I presented these in Council, not to grandstand, but to explain my position - that this city can be run well, and efficiently, without continually increasing expenditures and not giving Calgarians the true value of that investment.

I referred to it throughout the deliberations and will reference these sentiments throughout the course of my time as Alderman.

Opening speech at the beginning of Budget deliberations - November 22, 2011

Thank you Mayor Nenshi.

This budget

Is not about the elimination of staff positions, retaining current staff
It is not about maintaining front line or back of house staff
It is not about satisfying those who complain about taxes or city hall on an ongoing basis.
Or, holding taxes back to an unrealistic 0% increase
It is not about politics, theatre or the ‘nature of the beast’

This budget is about addressing our realities of financial constraint in a time of a when our economy demands it.

It is about the reality that collectively, we need to rethink our structure, our processes and our styles of work in a new way which changes the way we think and our methods and culture in a manner that ensures best value for the citizens of Calgary.

This new way of thinking also ensures, continues and solidifies Calgary’s future as the Greatest City in Canada and Calgary’s place on the international stage.

What is required is the political and personal will to hold the line on spending.

City Administration had the complete and amazing task of finding $46 million in efficiencies with no effect on services; and, $60 million of saving with very little impact on front line service.

This budgetary process, this yearly event that Council and Administration take part in, is about finding the correct balance of services compared to the revenues that the city collects.

The nature of this process means that citizens have a voice. We have seen this from the passion which they call our offices; by the way citizens take part in Our Budget, Our Future and every opportunity they have to get involved.

Quoting City Manager Owen Tobert

Citizens value City services and do not want to see a reduction in services
Citizens do not want the status quo. They want the city to focus on service priorities and deliver services in a much more efficient way

The process of changing culture in this building is not complete. If we accept the status quo or continue on this path then there is no need or impetus to change as all of our needs, and wants, will be satisfied within the organization to the possible detriment by eliminating the need to find efficiencies or the incentive to rethink and restructure city hall.

It is through necessity that organizations are required to rethink their processes, methods and priorities to remain efficient and relevant to its customers.

So, I ask members of Council to consider the recommendations brought forward by City Administration, and recognize the efforts that have been made by accepting their assertions; that this budget can succeed with very little change, to honour the effects made, and hold the line.

Closing speech at the conclusion of Budget Deliberations – November 29, 2011

I have stated several times over the past year that the “the City of Calgary must operate like a business and behave like a service provider.”

Above all else, this statement is a guiding principal that I follow while making any decisions on how we spend and allocate tax dollars.

A well run business does not typically spend more than it generates. Nor do well run businesses typically run deficits or increase the cost of its products beyond what customers are willing to pay. Governments, including the City of Calgary should be no different.

Though we have gone well into overtime talking about this years’ budget process, I feel that we succeeded on a number of fronts.

We have ensured that the tax rate for Calgarians remains as one of the lowest in the country
We have added funding to transit service, particularly to newly established communities
Sustained our Police budget
Adopted a comprehensive Cycling strategy
Addressed a strategy for “Tomorrow’s Workplace”, by restructuring how we utilize office and hours of operation for many departments

Though it is far from perfect, the work that Council and Administration have done brought the city closer to a balance of services to revenue.

As a business, we are finding efficiencies that are a necessary part of ensuring that our shareholders, the taxpayers of Calgary, are getting the best value for their investments.

At the same time, we are providing service to Calgarians and looking after those in our community who need it.

Although I had, and still have, great difficulty with several additions to the budget, some of which were not requested by administration, I honour Council’s overall decision.

As one member in a team of 15 representatives, all seeking to represent their constituents in the best way possible, not all of the votes will go in the way that I am comfortable with.

Many improvements as to how the city serves its stakeholders were made, but much more needs to be done.

After seven days of rigorous debate, Council made a decision to move forward.

A decision that, unless it was wildly contrary to the best interests of Calgarians, and showed no signs of benefit to the tax payers, should be ratified as we move through 2012.

Therefore I will support this budget and will continue to seek efficiencies and an open and transparent city hall.

On another note, I would like to tip my hat to the City of Calgary, and Mayor Nenshi, for their efforts during yesterday’s events (wind storm that cause damage, closing the downtown core).

My office received comments from a number of constituents regarding yesterday’s wind storm. Of note were the timely, informative and frequent responses from both Mayor Nenshi and the City of Calgary’s twitter accounts on what was occurring and updates on the closures of downtown.

Members of Parliament, what do you actually do for your constituents?

2011-11-24T15:39:00.000-07:00

Calgary, Alberta - Today is a very disappointing day for hundreds of thousands of Calgarians. It is a day of reflection on the level and value of service that we receive from the Members of Parliament whom we elected in May of this year.

Mayor Nenshi announced earlier today that the application submitted to P3 Canada, an arm’s length body of the Federal Government, for the funding of four recreation centers throughout Calgary, was denied.

This announcement came as a surprise to me. From all of the discussions I have had with various Members of Parliament, each had assured me that our funding application had been approved by P3 Canada and was simply awaiting a final signature from the highest level of the Federal Government.

While in Ottawa this year, I had an opportunity to speak with the Honourable Denis Lebel’s office, Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, regarding our application. At that time I received no indication that our application was being contested.

In August of 2011, my office sent a letter to the Honourable Jason Kenney, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Honourable Deepak Obhrai, Honourable Diane Ablonzy, Honourable Jim Flaherty and the Honourable Denis Lebel, inquiring about the the City’s application. I received no response.

In September, I met with Minister Kenney to speak directly on the subject of our application. I received no indication of our application being rejected.

We were assured of a favourable decision leading up to the Federal Election. Following the majority government's victory we were then strung along, only to learn that the whim of elected representatives, many hailing from Calgary, chose to overrule P3 Canada’s favourable decision. This is a slap in the face to those who helped elect this majority government.

The Federal Progressive Conservative Government has received unwavering support over the past several decades from Calgarians. However, during the last Federal Election, many of our Progressive Conservative candidates opted to ‘work in their neighbours garden rather take care of their own back yard’ and not even step foot in Alberta to interact with voters.

There are more than 300,000 Calgarians who are directly affected by this decision, 84,000 of those are children under 14 years of age who have very little, if any options for recreation within reasonable distance of where they live.

It is time we hold our Members of Parliament accountable and ask, ‘what do you actually do for your constituents’? I am urging all Calgarians to contact their Members of Parliament and ask why our representatives overturned this decision to and why did they not represent us?

There is an online petition and website dedicated to demanding action from our federal Government organized. I encourage you to visit http://recreation4calgary.wordpress.com/ for more details.

SETWAY - A Comprehensive Analysis of the Southeast Transit Way

2011-11-18T10:42:00.001-07:00

For residents of Southeast Calgary, an issue that has not faded over the years is the need for the Southeast leg of the LRT network which would run from the soon to be opened South Calgary Health Centre, to the downtown core.

This project has been promised, and put off, many times over the years. Some have used the criticism of low ridership that has kept the LRT off the map, others have claimed the large gap of non-residential land that sits in between downtown Calgary and the growing population of Wards 12 and 9 as the cause.

I, along with the vast majority of residents in Ward 12 who have no access to the city's LRT service, a service that the rest of Calgary enjoys, fully believe that an LRT link is vital to Southeast Calgary and Ward 12, one of the fastest growing areas of the city.

With in the next few years, Southeast Calgary will be home to the new South Calgary Health Centre, recreation facilities, shopping districts and a population explosion that will see more than 88,000 residents in Ward 12 alone.

There have been recent discussions regarding funds that may be freed up from MSI and GreenTrip programs that may be put towards the creation of the SETWAY. With this in mind, I release a study on the comparison of both LRT and BRT infrastructure, as well as an analysis of the Southeast TransitWay (SETWAY).

SETWAY - A Comprehensive Analysis of the Southeast Transit Way

Public Submission Speaking List for the City's Upcoming Budget Deliberations

2011-11-16T13:11:00.000-07:00

City Council budget deliberations will begin Monday, November 21 at 9:30 a.m. in Council Chambers. From Wednesday, November 9 to Thursday, to noon on November 17, citizens can register their name on a list to address Council.

Citizens can address Council up to a maximum of five (5) minutes regarding the proposed 2012 -2014 business plans and budgets. After the citizen’s address, Council will have the opportunity to ask questions to the speaker. If you have materials, please bring 35 copies for distribution.

To sign-up go to the budget website www.Calgary.ca/ourfuture or if you do not have a computer citizens can also call 3-1-1. Once at the online registration form and click on “Request this Service” highlighted in blue on the page. When filling out the form, please provide your full name, daytime phone number and a valid email address. They are required to complete the submission. You will be emailed a confirmation number which will prove your registration. After you have submitted your request you will be contacted, by either phone or email, on or after November 17 regarding a speaking time.

Please provide a preference about when you would wish to speak by writing your preference in the “additional comments” box on the form. You can request to speak during the day (starting after 9:30 am) or during an evening session (starting at 7:15 pm) on Monday November 21.

If you do not register ahead of time, you can still speak during the budget deliberation but you will need to drop by Council Chambers at 9:30 AM on Monday, November 21 to physically put your name on the speaking list. It is your responsibility, after registering and being contacted with your time, to be ready to speak in the Council Chamber at the assigned time. If you miss your time on Monday, you will have to wait until the speakers list is finished before you can speak.

FAQ

Question: Why is The City doing this?

Answer: This is an experiment to help make the speakers list more accessible and convenient for the public. In past budget deliberations, if citizens wanted to speak to Council about the budget you had to show up on Monday morning, be placed on the list and then wait your turn, which could be hours. We wish to try and accommodate citizens with more convenient times to speak.

Question: Why can’t I book an exact time online?

Answer: The amount of time Council will spend hearing public submissions will be determined by how many people want to speak. It may be only a few hours, or it may be days. That’s why we will contact you on or after Thursday, November 17, when we have a estimate of how many citizens have already registered. Citizens can speak during the day as well at a special evening public submission, starting at 7:15 pm, on Monday November 21.

Question: How can I confirm that I am registered?

Answer: You will be emailed a confirmation number. Keep your confirmation number as proof of registration.

Question: Am I on the right form?

Answer: The link from the Budget website will take you to the right form, just click on “Request this Service” highlighted in blue on the page to input your contact information. If for some reason you are not at Budget - 2012-2014 Council Public Submission - Speaking List, look for “1. Select Service Type” in the top left hand side of the screen. See it? Click on it, then click on the tab just below 1. Select Service Type that says “Please Select. . .” you should see a number of options, select the third item from the top of the list it is called “Budget - 2012-2014 Council Public Submission - Speaking List“ click go and then wait for the page to refresh and click on “Request this Service” highlighted in blue on the page.

Alternatively: If you do not see it, or cannot get the tab to work, type in Keywords “budget” and press “Go” then wait for the page to refresh and click on “Request this Service” highlighted in blue on the page.

Question: What if I have an issue, I’ve not been called back with a time?

Answer: If you have not been contacted by the morning of November 18 about your time, please contact the Office of the Mayor at 403-268-5622

Response to comments regarding Calgary Herald report on increase in crime in New Brighton

2011-10-27T09:02:00.007-06:00

Passion can serve as a great tool in a community by its members. However this week, through social media, an individual chose to take passionate exception to a news article and elected to lash out at the Calgary Police Service and my office as a result of a knee-jerk reaction to a perceived blemish on our ward, our city services and my term as Alderman.

In this instance, it was a personal, or political, reaction to a Calgary Herald article reporting on crime statistics which compared two similar, but very different statistics; the average crime in each community spanning 2005-2009, and the actual crime reported in each community in 2010. In this case, the result indicated an increase of over 200% in crime in New Brighton.

The Calgary Herald article that this is referring to represented two different statistics. One (2005-2009) was a five year average of the specific communities; the second was a snapshot of one year (2010).

What is missing from the Facebook comments (see below) is that the number, the 200% increase, is based on the average crime rate from between 2005-2009, and was compared to the crime statistics in 2010. At face value that increase does appear drastic, however, in any statement one must look at all variables of the issue that so that you can completely understand the numbers, the history and any editorial commentary, that is provided or absent.

Three glaring issues arose from the Calgary Herald article that should be noted are:

The 200% increase does not take into account that the population of New Brighton in 2005 was just over 1,200 residents. In 2010 the community grew to 6,075 residents, an increase of over 500%. One would predict or assume that the level of crime in turn would grow proportionately as the community grows.
Taking averages into account, one could assume that if a community has 1,200 residents in 2005, the rate of crime would be lower compared to the following year. The reported incidents in 2005 would be drastically lower than what that of 2009 and therefore, the 2009 number would be much higher than 26.2. One could assume that if 2010 had 88 reported incidents of crime the 2009 statistic would not be much lower than 88 and therefore not a true 200% increase.
The types of crimes that were committed should be considered. Crime in any nature is an issue to Calgarians, however, in communities that are in the midst of construction growth, an influx of non-residential construction crimes can be noticed. Theft of construction materials in fledgling communities is different than residential theft to property and person.

Of the established neighbourhoods in ward 12 that have completed their growth, in terms of their physical development, many of the communities have had a minor change in their statistics. Communities such as New Brighton are still in their infant stages of development and likely won’t be fully established for some time.

In 2005, the community of New Brighton was home to 1,206 people, compared to the 6,078 people who resided in New Brighton in 2010. As the Calgary Herald indicated, it is focussed on the average of 2005-2009 and compared to that of 2010; here is how those numbers break down:

Average population of New Brighton from 2005-2009 – 2,948 residents

26.2 incidents of crime were averaged during the period of 2005-2009

Population of New Brighton in 2010 – 6,078 residents

88 crimes were reported during this single year

If you look at the increase in population between the two statistics (1,206 residents in 2005 and 6,078 in 2010), the Community of New Brighton has seen a population increase of more than 500%. Just as the community expands one would expect the incidents of crime to increase as well.

With any statistic there must be a comparison with other communities to see the city as a big picture, rather than an isolation of fledgling community as it grows.

As a snapshot without having the full background, it may seem that this number is considerable, until you consider the background and how this amazing community has grown since 2005.

The criticism of the fine work done by the Calgary Police Service, the Community Liaison Officer and the Office of the Alderman for political gain in any public forum has very little to do with the level of service and overall crime statistics and more to do with knee-jerk reactions to headlines that serve to detract the overall sense of safety and well-being that Calgarians enjoy.

The passion by this community leader in the Facebook post does an excellent job at bringing to mind the need for residents and neighbours to be vigilant and get involved in their community, but, without analyzing the facts, those criticisms do little in the way of bringing a sense of community feeling and working to solve the issues.

www.calgary.ca/CSPS/CNS/Documents/.../ward_12_profile.pdf - 2006-2010
www.calgary.ca/CSPS/CNS/Documents/...social.../new_brighton.pdf - 2005

Facebook post from October 23, 2011

Wendi Roy-Moore

I am TOTALLY disgusted ... Just read in this morning's Calgary Herald that our community has had an increase of OVER 200% in crime reported. We are one of only a FEW communities with this problem. What are our police services doing to help us out? What is, or can, our Alderman do in helping this situation? Apparently nothing... I guess our problem is we don't have enough shootings or gang related activity to warrant help by the police.

LikeUnlike • • Share • Yesterday at 8:58am • Shared with: Public

Christine McConnell don't blame the Police.......it is the people that live there! I am a supporter of Policemen and women...you try their job...not easy very hard and like every profession there are good ones and bad ones....The father and grandfather of my children are policemen and until you walk a mile in their shoes and deal with what they deal with daily you might re think your statement.

Yesterday at 9:05am • LikeUnlike

Wendi Roy-Moore It isn't the people that live here that are always to blame. We have a police liaison officer for our community that is to help us in dealing with community crime prevention methods, etc. and yet we have a liaison officer that has been reassigned, has not been visible at our community meetings and has not provided crime statistics for our community (as asked) over a period of six months .. so that we, as a community, can pinpoint the problem and work with the community to ensure crime stays down. Our Block Watch community program has been put in disarray, as the organization is now being rebranded and we get no help from them .. so, tell me, what more, as a community can we do if we are not aware of how high the crime rate is if our police services does not make us aware of the problem, so that we can work as a community to bring down the crime rate? We have made the police aware, many times, that we have a suspected drug house just a few doors down from us, yet, I don't see any real police activity in our area to close it down. We ask for updates on these things, yet, because we have a liaison officer that is a no show at many meetings ( and now we have a new one that has not shown up to meetings yet) how can we get updates????? So, yes, I do blame the police .. to a point ... for not keeping us informed and helping us as a community with the tools we need.

Yesterday at 9:13am • LikeUnlike

Christine McConnell How about we agree to disagree on this one ....so easy to sit an assume how things work at the Police Department when you are looking in from the outside

Yesterday at 9:18am • LikeUnlike

Wendi Roy-Moore I totally agree on your assessment. I do respect what the police do on a daily basis, don't get me wrong on that one, it's just as a community resident here in Calgary, we are encouraged to report crime, work vigilantly to educate our neighbours on what things bring on criminal activity, etc. but when we try to get things solved and our community police liaison reps are not there to help with those things, we, as outsiders, tend to feel very frustrated and then move on to the anger mode where we then begin to wonder what the police are doing for the regular folk (ones not involved in criminal activity). So, I think the police do a VERY commendable job as a protective force, we just feel very frustrated when it come to other crimes like B&E's and yet we aren't always made aware of just how much is occuring.

Yesterday at 10:09am • LikeUnlike

Bill Jarvis Hi Wendi - 88 crimes for 2800 homes isn't that bad. Only 3% of homes affected. You could live there for 33 years without an incident. The problem with the Herald presentation is that it compared current crime stats with a 5 year avg when there were far fewer homes in New Brighton. Compare your total incidents to some other communities with declining crime rates, and I guarantee you'd still much rather live in New Brighton.

19 hours ago • LikeUnlike

Wendi Roy-Moore Oh no doubt Bill. My concern is the lack of community tools/support we are supposed to receive from our CPS Liasion officer.

Addition to my statement on Occupy Calgary from October 17, 2011 (copied below)

2011-10-17T16:20:00.006-06:00

October 28, 2011 - Since my statement of last week, little has changed in my views regarding the demonstrations for the group called Occupy Calgary.

I have indicated publically over the course of these demonstrations that each citizen has the right to free speech and assembly, and that does include demonstrating at Olympic Plaza, or any other public space.

I have also indicated that, as the City of Calgary has allowed the group the use of space at St. Patrick’s Island, and not at Olympic Plaza, they should vacate the plaza and return to the agreed upon location.

I feel that the tents should be removed as soon as possible. I have no issue of anyone using Olympic Plaza to demonstrate their issues as many have done over the years; during the day.

However, at night, this group of demonstrators becomes a group of people living on public land.

The City of Calgary is incurring costs as a result of demonstrations at Olympic Plaza, an area that is not suited for the type of footprint that is being left by the demonstrators..

The purpose of allowing the group to occupy St. Patrick’s Island is due to the fact that is and that is better suited to accommodate the tents and would not incur the same level of damage and maintenance than that of Olympic Plaza.

I am actively looking into what can be done to resolve this issue. As one Alderman out of 15 I am investigating the best way to act on behalf of the constituents of Ward 12 who have expressed concern on this issue and how it affecting their enjoyment of Olympic Plaza.

Original statement posted on October 17th, 2011

October 17, 2011 - My office has received several calls regarding the Occupy Calgary demonstrations taking place in Calgary.

The essential make up of this demonstration is to occupy space to voice their concerns. The City has been quite reasonable in allowing this group of citizens to practice their free speech rights by providing space and very basic amenities at Saint Patrick’s Island.

While the city is honouring the rights of the demonstrators to assemble and express, it should be incumbent on them to also honour the rights of all citizens who wish to benefit from Olympic Plaza, a hallmark and central attraction to all Calgarians.

Many have asked, “Does this set precedence for other demonstrations to occupy public land for various causes?”

This particular social initiative is one that is prevalent in many major North American cities at the moment. Their apparent basis of demonstration is to occupy space in economic districts to comment on various socio-economic issues.

As I have been told, this is a unique scenario, and like any other demonstrations to follow, will be reviewed case by case.

The City, Bylaw Department, CEMA and Calgary Police Service are fully aware of Occupy Calgary’s direct relationship to similar demonstrations occurring throughout the country, and, in the best interest of its citizens are working closely with the demonstrators to ensure that those taking part in Occupy Calgary, and all of the residents of Calgary, are safe and healthy.

Innovation Fund Application

2011-09-26T21:16:00.003-06:00

In an area such as Ward 12, which is fast proving itself to be the Jewel of Calgary; expansion, growth and development have played a role in creating traffic issues.

Traffic safety problems are one of the top complaints we have from constituents and which consume a great deal of time and energy responding to them.

By not addressing traffic safety effectively at the time of development we affect many downstream communities as traffic finds its own route to its destination.

Through an Innovation Fund application I am striving to find a balance between the impact that traffic has on the various communities and their surrounding areas and how they are communicated.

Below is a copy of the Innovation Fund Application that I am presenting.

Date: September 8, 2011

Name of Project: Traffic Impact Reports – Safety Component
Sponsor: Shane Keating – Ward 12
Phone Number: 403-268-2478

Affected Business Unit(s) and/or Departments: Transportation – Traffic Operations

Amount of Funds Requested: $25,000 for the project and $5,000 for a community mail out if needed.

Summary Description of Projec:

Ongoing traffic safety issues that arise from specific development projects create an ongoing liability for the city costing millions of dollars in remedial infrastructure and post construction traffic intervention. They also create serious ongoing risk which leads to injury and sometimes death causing adversarial conflicts with our communities and constituents costing further resources and manpower.

Predictable and foreseeable traffic safety concerns are rarely part of the traffic impact studies (TIS) attached to project development proposals. Nor do these TIS consider the accumulated effect of several projects happening in the same area about the same time which can be significant.

As a result the city incurs most or all the costs of post construction traffic responses since these safety challenges are not issues until months or years after the projects get built. These costs include post event safety studies and safety responses such as traffic calming, new lights, pedestrian corridors, etc.

This study proposes to evaluate several past projects in the ward that are currently creating significant traffic issues, review the city’s response to determine how these problems might have been assessed and what remedial infrastructure should have been included in the DP as part of the development costs. The study will include detailed community engagement in the affected areas. It will also show how these challenges impact other communities downstream from the project.

If successful this pilot project will provide the City with a template for future TIS that will ensure safer communities and significant city savings from additional traffic safety work.

Proposed Timeline (including proposed date of final report): The project can start immediately after approval and will take approximately 90 days to complete. It is proposed that the final report be done by February 2012 so that insights obtained can be researched and implemented before the construction season starts in 2012.

How does this project meet the criteria of the fund as set out in the Terms of Reference for the Council Innovation Fund?

Dozens of traffic impact studies are requested every year, in every ward and yet new communities continue to have escalating traffic issues which consume enormous amounts of city resources. These challenges trickle down to existing communities which must now deal with increased traffic flow and shortcutting that were never investigated as part of the original TIS. This study looks at a new approach to assessing the long term traffic impact of a project and has the potential of saving millions of dollars of remedial infrastructure costs by placing those costs with the development where they belong. It has implications across the city.

What does success look like and how will it be measured?

New development works when it properly integrates into the existing transportation system and adds needed new infrastructure that is consistent with the needs of the community. While increased traffic flow is often a given byproduct of growth it does not have to decrease traffic safety if properly managed. To be successful this project will clearly outline cases where the city has spent money doing remedial traffic safety work which could have been included in the original DP by the developer. The report will include specific community engagement by individuals directly affected by the traffic problems - likely from door to door canvassing rather than public meetings which are often dominated by interest groups. The final report will show where money could have been saved and the risk to the community reduced.

Attachments

1. Suggested Candidate Selection Criteria

It is unlikely that City transportation staff could complete this study within the desired time line. Plus it will give the project more transparency to be done by an outside consultant. However most traffic engineering consultants have a vested interest in the current system as that is what their clients are asking for. This project should be done by a traffic safety expert not currently producing traffic impact studies for developers.

The successful candidate should meet the following requirements.

Considerable practical experience with traffic safety issues, ideally from actually attending crash locations.
Experience and expertise in community engagement, particularly one on one. This will require expertise in using established sampling techniques to ensure the data collected from sampling is representative of the overall population for predictive validity.
Expertise in the traffic response methods that the city can employ from traffic calming, added infrastructure and especially traffic enforcement tactics.
Expertise in data collection techniques related to traffic studies – especially safety issues which go beyond just counting cars and turning movements.

Southeast TransitWay (SETWAY)

2011-09-14T12:25:00.000-06:00

Overview

Calgary Transit has initiated the predesign for the Southeast Transitway, or SETWAY, working to improve public transit services in Southeast Calgary.

Between 1999 and 2006, Calgary Transit completed functional studies for the future Southeast LRT - one of six LRT lines planned for Calgary. For more information, see http://www.calgarytransit.com/pdf/Southeast%20LRT%20Compendium.pdf

These studies identified a feasible alignment for the LRT as well as high-level land requirements and costs. To build the entire length of Southeast LRT between the downtown and the South Health Campus in Seton would cost upwards of $2 billion. In the absence of sufficient funding for LRT, The City is studying options for staging improvements in the form of bus rapid transit (BRT) on exclusive transitways.

A Transitway is an exclusive roadway for public transit buses that includes stations and transit terminals. The term originated in the Ottawa region in Ontario, where the bus-based Transitway currently serves as the core of their rapid transit network.

Options for the SETWAY will be developed to improve travel time, reliability and convenience for Route 302 (http://www.calgarytransit.com/route_maps/rte302.html) and other routes in Southeast Calgary. SETWAY options will be evaluated under The City’s Sustainability Approach according to four perspectives:

Environment
Community well-being
Economy
Smart growth and mobility

What is a predesign?

The predesign process will refine the technology, infrastructure, right of way, land requirements to get the SETWAY ready for detailed design and construction. The early phases of the predesign will identify what incremental improvements will serve Southeast Calgary best in terms of improved travel time, reliability and convenience. It is anticipated that the SETWAY will be developed incrementally to best use available funding. The later phases of the predesign will include comprehensive transit-oriented development (TOD) planning in priority station areas.

When will public engagement be held?

The first public engagement events will be held in Fall 2011. The City will present findings on the early phases of the predesign to the public for input before making a recommendation on improvements to City Council. Additional public engagement, including comprehensive TOD planning, will be held in 2012 as the predesign advances.

Will the Province of Alberta’s GreenTRIP funding be used?

At the direction of City Council, The City has made an application to The Province for GreenTRIP funding for the SETWAY. Completion of the initial phase of the predesign is a necessary step in refining the application. The City must identify what segments of the SETWAY it proposes to construct, along with the one-third local matching funds required as part of all GreenTRIP projects.

For more information or to share comments:
Web: http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/setway_20110725.html
Email: CTCustomerFeedback@calgary.ca
Phone: 403-262-1000

Frisbee Fling

2011-08-30T08:57:00.007-06:00

On Saturday, September 10, 2011, the communities that make up Ward 12 came together for a day of bouncy houses, hot dogs and fun.

Our intention was to gather everyone together to break the Guinness World Record for the 'most Frisbees launched simultaneously', but unfortunately we fell well short of the required number to beat the record.

We did have a Plan B up our sleeve to create a spectacle that would leave an impression on those who attended. Our Plan B was to treat everyone involved, including some special guests, to the World's Largest Paper Ball Fight.

Below are two one of the video's that were taken to capture the record attempt.

The record for the paper ball fight is a new record according to Guinness World Records. We will be sending this video, along with other corresponding materials to Guinness World Records to verify the attempt.

Special thanks goes to all of the sponsors (South Point Toyota, Alison Redford, Rick Fraser, Scarlett Francis Pet Sitting, Canada Safeway, Pattison Outdoor Advertising, McDonalds, Riteway Signs) who helped to make this day a success.

Thanks also goes to the City of Calgary staff who went above and beyond to prepare the large field at St. Albert the Great School in preparation for the Frisbee toss.

A final accounting of the funds that were raised will be done, and all proceeds will be given back to the Community Associations that took part on Saturday.

Original Entry

What are you doing on Saturday, September 10th, 2011? Do you want to help break a Guinness World Record, and support several community associations?

Alderman Shane Keating would like to invite you and your family to join him for the Frisbee Fling.

The Frisbee Fling event will be an exciting experience for the entire family that will bring fun, excitement and a possible Guinness World Record to Calgary. It will give Calgarians an opportunity to get to know and support the community associations that make up Ward 12.

The Frisbee Fling will take place on Saturday, September 10, 2011 in the field adjacent to St. Albert the Great school in McKenzie Towne.

To help cover the cost of the event and provide funding back to the communities, a wristband to participate in the event or attractions bought for $2.00.

City Wide Towing will be cooking up some BBQ where hungry participants can grab a hot dog and a pop for $3.00.

All proceeds will be divided up between the participating Community Association that make up Ward 12.

This unique community event will treat more than 1000 people, of all ages, to a variety of carnival style games, music and a meet and greet with Alderman Shane Keating, culminating in a Guinness World Record attempt.

The Guinness World Record that will be broken will be for the most Frisbees launched simultaneously.

The current record is 853 participants throwing a Frisbee at the same time.

Shane Keating was elected as the Alderman of Ward 12 in October 2010’s civic election, as one of five newly elected councillors.

Since taking office, Alderman Keating has spearheaded the campaign to link the communities that make up Ward 12 to the entire City of Calgary transit network with the creation of a future LRT system called the Southeast TransitWay (SETWAY).

Alderman Keating is leading the charge to reduce unnecessary spending by the city and seeking ways to combine resources that will make it easier for Calgarians to access services. Most recently, Alderman Keating passed the motion to thank those in the Canadian Forces who volunteer their time and their lives serving overseas for the sacrifices they have made.

One of his campaign pledges during the 2010 civic election was to host a community wide event that would promote and support each of the 10 diverse communities that make up Ward 12.

Stay tuned for more information and check out our Facebook page for further updates.

http://on.fb.me/frisbee-fling

Calgary must operate like a business and behave like a service provider

2011-08-15T15:44:00.003-06:00

“Calgary must operate like a business and behave like a service provider.”

Above all else, this statement should be the guiding principal that all members of Council and Administration follow while making any decisions when it comes to how we spend and allocate tax dollars.

A well run business does not typically spend more than it generates. Nor do well run businesses typically run deficits. Governments, including the City of Calgary should be no different.

Each year, the City collects revenue from a variety of sources such as taxes, through service charges and other levels of government. Council and Administration are tasked with allocating these funds to a wide variety programs and services.

That does not mean for one moment that those funds should not be spent wisely.

As a competent Council and Administration, it is our responsibility to ensure that we spend those tax dollars as efficiently as possible and to budget according to our means.

It is also our responsibility to ensure that if there are ways to reduce the amount that we spend, or find alternative revenues that would reduce our reliance on tax dollars, that we investigate that as well.

The Calgary Police Service, in an effort to reduce costs has begun investigating the option of voluntary contract buyouts for certain positions in ways that won’t affect the quality or level of service.

This proactive approach to cost savings is commendable and should be investigated throughout the City of Calgary.

I am currently working Administration to catalogue and understand the scope of all land and building assets that the city owns and develop a strong and long term, asset management strategy.

Part of this investigative process is to ask questions, to determine not only what the city owns, but what is the purpose of retaining and maintaining the various assets?

Does the city have any plans in the near future for that particular asset? Can the land or building be sold to the private sector so that it doesn’t burden the taxpayer and can, in-turn, inject revenues back into city projects?

These are questions that are currently being asked and would become a regular part of this strategy to determine any changes in the City’s asset holding from year to year.

Recently I introduced the concept of raising revenue for the city without using, or raising, taxes. This could be done by selling the naming rights of the various LRT stations to the private sector in return for funding.

I believe that if Council is going to work in the best interests of Calgarians, that this is an idea worth discussing.

There are many questions to ask surrounding this concept, such as:

How would the value of each station be determined?
Is there interest in the public sector for this type of initiative?
Who would administer this project?
What City projects would benefit from this initiative?

An RFI would need to be drafted and sent out to determine the answers to some of these questions.

A well run business is innovative, creative and customer focussed. The City of Calgary should operate like a well run business and behave like a service provider. The bottom line is if we never ask ‘how can we do things differently’, we will always get the same result.

What's in a name?

2011-08-10T16:14:00.001-06:00

In council last month, during a discussion on what to name the newest Northeast LRT stations, I introduced the idea of partnering with the private sector to help underwrite some of the funding opportunities that Calgary is seeking to fill.

In particular, I suggested that Council consider offering the rights to rename some of Calgary’s LRT stations in exchange for funding that would be put towards a host of city wide projects.such as, but not nearly limited to, community development and recreation centres.

There are many projects throughout the city that could benefit from this type of revenue; revenue that would not go back into the general operations budget.

The City of Calgary currently has a policy of issuing naming rights for some city owned facilities and several well known destinations have incorporated this policy. Some examples of this are, the Telus World of Science, Talisman Centre, Scotiabank Saddledome and Shaw Millennium Park.

The idea would be to keep the original name, and visual, that is associated with the current platforms with the corporate name simply added on.

For example, in Toronto, the TTC is considering a naming opportunity by combining the current Dundas station with Ryerson University. The proposed name of the station would be Dundas-Ryerson Station. The same principals would be used with this concept.

My thought would be to set up a committee of sorts to review each submission and determine if adapting a particular name suits the community and makes sense for the city.

The specific amount of the sponsorship and process would be discussed with Administration and take into consideration the value of the naming opportunity and how best to ensure that the spirit of Calgary does not get wrapped up in advertising, but rather a subtle way putting our resources to the best use.

What Calgary Means

2011-07-28T08:45:00.003-06:00

Last month my office hed a contest for students who live in Ward 12 to tell us in what ever creative way they could what their Calgary meant to them and invited them to join us last weekend for Ward 12 at the Zoo.

We had over 70 extremely creative entries from children throughout the ward.

Below is a poem that we received that we felt said it all.

Calgary

Submitted by:
Janet Li

A grade 5 student in Ward 12

My Calgary is so beautiful

It makes people faint.

It is so detailed that

Leonardo daVinci can’t even paint!

The clear skies are always bright blue

There’s nothing in Calgary that you can’t do.

We’re free everyday

We have our rights and our choices

We can sing we can dance

We can make loud noises.

The people are so nice,

There’s not one that doesn’t smile

Coming to Calgary is definitely worth while

Once you come,

I guarantee you won’t want to leave

We’re polite and sweet,

We always say please

There’s nothing to worry about in Calgary at all …

But there are no months, just snow and Fall!

Controlled burns taking place this summer in Kananaskis

2011-07-21T15:30:00.000-06:00

Our office received an update from Minister Cindy Ady regarding prescribed fires in Kananaskis Country scheduled to take place this summer (depending on the weather).

The smoke from the controlled burns could possibly affect the air quality in the City. Below is some more information on the activity with a link to the Government of Alberta's website.

Prescribed fires restoring ecosystems and reducing potential for large-scale wildfires in Kananaskis Country

July 15, 2011 update:

WHAT'S HAPPENING?

Preparations are underway to recommence the Buller Creek prescribed fire project in Kananaskis Country.

Crews will be in the area through the coming days to establish work sites and lay hoses.

HOW THIS MIGHT AFFECT YOU

Crews, trucks and helicopter activity may be seen.
Highway 742 will remain open and no traffic delays are expected.
The Buller Creek prescribed fire unit is located 20 kilometres south of Canmore along Highway 742, and is approximately 950 hectares (ha) in size. In 2010, approximately 35 ha of guard was established. 2011 operations will complete the guard, and proceed to main unit. Fire managers will only proceed when they can ensure a safe operation that will meet the overall objectives of the prescribed fire, while minimizing smoke-related issues.

WHEN?

The area shown on the map is closed for prescribed fire around Buller Creek in Spray Valley Provincial Park, effective July 19, 2011 until further notice.

http://www.tpr.alberta.ca/parks/kananaskis/Prescribed_Fires.asp

The Closure of 52nd Street S.E.

2011-07-20T10:24:00.002-06:00

This summer, beginning on August 13, 2011, 52nd Street S.E. (between 94th Avenue and 106 Avenue S.E.) will close to make way for bridge construction and lane improvement.

This will drastically impact residents of Ward 12,and Ward 9, who rely on very few options to travel to and from work, schools, childcare and any other destination in the city.

With the ongoing construction on Deerfoot Trail and the lack of a direct transit link, or SETWAY, to the rest of the city, Barlow trail will become the main artery for motorists in the ward. My office is working with the City’s Transportation department to find solutions to alleviate the congestion that will occur following the closure.

Some measures that my office is proposing are:

Adjust the timing of traffic lights at Barlow and Glenmore to allow a better flow of through traffic northbound;
Install temporary lights at the corner of 114th Avenue and 84th Street
Allow duel left turns on Shepard Road to Glenmore Trail

It does not make sense to me to reduce a major freeway to one lane northbound (Deerfoot Trail) at the same time as restricting thousands of commuters with the closing 52nd Street for a year while building the entire leg of Stony Trail.

The widening of 52nd Street will be a great relief to residents of Wards 12 & 9 when the work is completed in August 2012, but it raises the concern of how the City of Calgary and the Government of Alberta can work better, collaborate and do things differently.

You can view the rendered drawings of how 52nd Street will look following the year long construction and see how the work that will be done will vastly improve our access from Ward 12 to the rest of the city.

http://www.calgary.ca/docgallery/bu/transportation_infrastructure/52_street/52st-bridge-construction-renderings.pdf

Below is a copy of the confirmation that my office received. As more information comes available, and as the measures that I am proposing go into effect, my office will keep the residents that are affected by this disruption up to date.

Received July 19, 2011

Alderman Keating:

This is to inform you that the temporary closure of 52 Street S.E. between 94 Avenue and 106 Avenue will begin on August 13, 2011.

This closure will last for at least 12 months (weather permitting) to allow for the construction of two new bridges over the Western Headworks Canal (WHC) and the CP Railway tracks, widening of 52 Street between 94 Avenue and 106 Avenue, a new storm water management system, deep utilities relocation, relocation of pipelines, power distribution and transmission lines, and a new digested sludge crossing under the canal.

Prior to this temporary closure taking effect, a number of new access roads are being built for the businesses along 52 Street between 90 Avenue and 106 Avenue S.E.

During the closure, The City suggests motorists use Barlow Trail as the main alternative to this portion of 52 Street, with access from either Glenmore Trail, 90 Avenue, 106 Avenue or 114 Avenue.

All the construction for this project must be completed by March 31, 2013 in order to comply with federal government funding guidelines stipulated in the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund Contribution Agreement between the Government of Canada and The City of Calgary for the 52nd Street Expansion Project.

For more information, visit the 52 Street S.E. Road Widening project page on The City’s website, Calgary.ca/ti.

SETWAY RFP – The first real steps in getting the Southeast TransitWay

2011-06-13T16:03:00.000-06:00

The first, real, stage of getting the SETWAY from its conceptual form to becoming the direct transit route from the future South Calgary Health Centre to downtown Calgary is underway.

A request for proposals (RFP) has gone out by the city to find an 'organization to provide professional scoping and strategy development services’ for the SETWAY.

This pre-design study is first step in a long overdue saga that will eventually connect the residents of Ward 12, 14, 9 and 10 with the current web of LRT services.

My office will be working with the city’s transportation department, as well as the community, to create a great transit link for the Southeast.

The closing date for the RFP is June 24

.

One man pothole patcher - good for Calgary?

2011-06-04T12:11:00.000-06:00

During my recent attendance at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities I came across this option to help alleviate the problem of potholes in Calgary.

Check out this site - Python Manufacturing - I will bring some information back with me for the City's Administration to look at.

If you have any feedback as whether this is something that Council and Administration should look at, please let me know by email (eaward12@calgary.ca) or by responding to this blog.

2011-06-03T10:27:00.011-06:00

It is no secret to anyone living in Calgary’s Ward 12, or anywhere in the Southeast quadrant of Calgary, that the need for a direct and timely route connecting the downtown core to the new South Calgary Health Centre is lacking.

During my campaign leading up to the 2010 civic election, I made, among other issues, the creation of a Southeast LRT line a priority. A key priority that I would strive to accomplish during my time as Councillor of Ward 12.

The City of Calgary has an aging fleet of LRT vehicles and is in the process of acquiring a newer and more modern fleet to compliment the four car platforms that are currently being constructed.

Over the past 6 months I have met with representatives from several LRV manufacturers and have seen some of what the new breed of LRT vehicles will bring to Calgary.

While at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities I became aware of the Aerobus, a “self propelled vehicle speeds silently through the sky carrying 300 passengers.”

Aside from the price tag difference of an elevated LRT, compared to the current LRT lines that Calgary enjoys, the reduced need to build at grade infrastructure (tracks, traffic control, land usage), the lack of disruption for motorists and the reduced environmental footprint encouraged me to look at this as well as all of the other options for which to design the Southeast TransitWay (SETWAY).

Below are some samples of what the Aerobus technology looks like in an urban setting.

I invite you, as the future users of the SETWAY, to let me know what you think. Please take a look at the photos and of the Aerobus website and send your feedback to my office (eaward12@calgary.ca), or post a comment on this blog.

Your feedback on this, and other issues, is what helps me work in the best interests of you, the ward and of the City of Calgary.

Aerobus Website http://www.aerobus.com/home.html

Friday, June 3, 2011 - Addition to this article.

My office had an opportunity to speak with Aerobus International's Chariman, Dennis Stallings regarding some questions that were posed following the release of this post. Below are some of the responses.

Alderman Keating's Office

Are there any geographical constraints that would prevent or restrict this transit option in Calgary?

Aerobus

There are not geographical constraints from installing Aerobus with exception of spanning over a large body of water.

If and when the span between pylons exceeds 1200 feet the installation becomes difficult and a cost analysis should be done to determine if it is prudent to seek an alternative route.

If there is a greater than 3 degree turn on the route, then a fixed rail addition would be needed, however, each stop would have a fixed rail addition for stop points, so if there is any large curve that would be needed on the route, they would suggest putting a natural station there.

Alderman Keating's Office

Does the density of the area, or lack of, pose a problem to installing the infrastructure?

Aerobus

The best scenario is to build around the line as it grows.

However, it would be benefitial to begin building a line in an already dense or growing area, run the track near or through a non-developed area and connect with another dense area or core as compared to building the lines through a fully dense area.

Alderman Keating’s Office

What type of technology does the Aerobus system use?

Aerobus

The Aerobus uses off the shelf technology and can adapt to the needs of the customer.

If the current system uses proprietary technology the we would have to do a work around to adjust, however we can generally adapt to whatever system is currently in use.

Alderman Keating’s Office

What is the capacity of the Aerobus?

Aerobus

The Aerobus system uses modules. Each module has the comfortable capacity of 35 passengers. There can be a maximum of 12 modules per trip, (up to 420 passengers).

It is cost effective to build for the capacity you expect in the future when you start the process to be able to utilize it in a cost effective manner when the population warrants it.

Alderman Keating’s Office

Can the trains turn around or go in both directions?

Aerobus

The train cars have driver controls at both ends of the car so they can go forward and backwards with ease.

The elevated track can be built with one lane or two so that cars can pass each other if that is what is reauired.

Spring Clean-up in Ward 12

2011-05-04T15:35:00.001-06:00

The City of Calgary has begun their annual Spring Clean up – Street Cleaning and will be in your area shortly. Please refer below to the Ward 12 community schedule:

For more information in the spring clean-up, please refer to the City of Calgary's website:

http://www.calgary.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_766_233_0_43/http%3B/content.calgary.ca/CCA/City+Hall/Business+Units/Roads/Road+Maintenance/Spring+Clean+up+street+cleaning/Sweeping+Schedule.htm

Looking for 'ZooperStars'

2011-04-15T15:58:00.004-06:00

Alderman Shane Keating is looking for 70 talented, bright and creative

'ZooperStars' from Ward 12 to describe what their Calgary looks like.

Can “Your Calgary” be best described as a poem? We’d love to read it.
Does describing “Your Calgary” cause you to break out in song? We’d love to hear it?
Can “Your Calgary” be described through art or sculpture? That is something that we need to see.

We will select 70 students who submit their vision of what their Calgary looks like to receive a 4 pack of tickets to join Alderman Keating and his team for an afternoon at the Zoo.

The contest is open to any elementary or junior high school students who live in Ward 12.

All entries should include the following:

Name
Age
Address
Phone number
Email
Social media addresses (if applicable)
School name

The deadline for entries is June 18, 2011.

For more information on Ward 12 at the Zoo or to submit an entry please contact:

Brianna Rogers,
Constituent Assistant to Alderman Shane Keating
Phone: 403-268-1698
Fax: 403-268-8091
Ward12@calgary.ca

There's Room for Rec-centres in Ward 12

2011-03-31T15:12:00.003-06:00

In March, the Provincial Government informed Council that it would not be collecting the full amount of property taxes from Calgarians, effectively creating tax room in the amount of $42 million per year.

I gave very careful thought on how best to proceed with my vote and though I am very respectful on the issue of increasing the tax commitment that Calgarians pay each year, I am also respectful of finding a balance of the type of services that the city provides versus the type of service that Calgarians demand.

The Provincial Government did what the city has been asking for; leave more money for the city to use for community infrastructure and across the CPRIIPS and ERIIPS lists.

Council had several options on how to use the funds including; rejecting the offer from the government, return the funds to Calgarians, or use the funds as they were originally intended to be used by the Provincial Government, and reinvest the $42 million per year into various infrastructure projects that Calgarians have been demanding.

By a vote of 11-3, Council moved to use those funds and reinvest them back into the community. What amounts to $6.00 per month for each property owner ($72 per year), will now do what the money was intended for; to build infrastructure in Calgary.

As a direct result of Council’s decision, Ward 12 may soon be home to two full service recreation facilities; a $120 million recreation centre built in Seton and a $70 million recreation centre built in Quarry Park. There may also be a $50 million recreation center built in Great Plains and a $120 million recreation centre built in the Northwest.

The direction by Council will also fund lifecycle maintenance, renewal and construction of community infrastructure such as fire halls, parks, community facilities.

The only way that these centers could otherwise be built is through direct multi-million dollar private funding, provincial and municipal taxes or a combination of both.

The decision by council will also contribute to improved library services in Calgary and a host of other benefits that would otherwise not be funded.

“The $42 million that Calgary will benefit from each year as a result of the tax room provided by the Provincial Government, will play a large role in building the infrastructure that Calgary is demanding and build recreation centers that I pledged to bring to Ward 12.

Calgarians will still pay no higher of a tax rate tomorrow as they would have last week, though we will see a much greater value for our dollar than we would have yesterday

Pecuniary interest

2011-02-16T18:35:00.005-07:00

Update - March 7, 2011 - Today Council will be discussing the secondary suites issue that was discussed at the Land Use Planning and Transportation committee held last month.

Due to a conflict of interest, I was forced to recluse myself from the discussion at committee, and in turn, today's discussion at Council.

I have met with the City of Calgary's Legal Department on their interpretation of the Municipal Government Act pertaining to conflicts of interest.

Below is the written response provided to me via the city's Legal Department.

The debate on the decision to excuse myself from taking part in the Land Use Planning & Transportation Committee was not a decision that came lightly.

All Councillors who are elected to represent the citizens of Calgary, and Alberta, are bound by the rules set out by the Province of Alberta’s Municipal Government Act.

My obligation to the voters of Calgary regarding issues where there is a direct pecuniary interest to what is being debated was to remove myself from the discussion. Had I not done so, I would have contravened the spirit of the Act and would have been subject to being disqualified from the Land Use Planning & Transportation Committee.

Below is the portion of the Act that guides all city councillors and was the impetus for my decision to remove myself from today's discussion.

Pecuniary interest

170(1) Subject to subsection (3), a councillor has a pecuniary interest in a matter if

(a) the matter could monetarily affect the councillor or an employer of the councillor, or

(b) the councillor knows or should know that the matter could monetarily affect the councillor’s family.

Disclosure of pecuniary interest

172(1) When a councillor has a pecuniary interest in a matter before the council, a council committee or any other body to which the councillor is appointed as a representative of the council, the councillor must, if present,

(a) disclose the general nature of the pecuniary interest prior to any discussion of the matter,

(b) abstain from voting on any question relating to the matter,

(d) subject to subsections (2) and (3), leave the room in which the meeting is being held until discussion and voting on the matter are concluded.

Disqualification of Councillors

Reasons for disqualification

174(1) A councillor is disqualified from council if (i) the councillor uses information obtained through being on council to gain a pecuniary benefit in respect of any matter;

http://www.alsa.ab.ca/uploads/files/PDF/acts%20and%20reg/MunicipalGovernmentAct2009.pdf

Secondary Suites

2011-02-14T10:14:00.003-07:00

Update on Secondary Suites - February 16, 2011

On February 16th, I voluntarily removed myself from the discussions on secondary suites at the Land Use Planning & Transportation Committee. Realizing that there may be a possible conflict of interest, excusing myself from the proceedings seemed to be the most prudent course of action at this time.

Family members of mine will be moving into my residence for which I will be in the position of putting forward an application for a secondary suite in the near future.

Regardless of any conflict I have, the issue of secondary suites in Calgary is an issue that affects not only Ward 12, but the entire city.

Currently, approximately 60% of Ward 12 is zoned to accept secondary suites and approximately 40% are designated R1, RC1 and RC1L, and are not zoned for secondary suites.

With the decision coming to committee and council, there are a number of factors that must be addressed in order for me to vote in favour of allowing secondary suites throughout the ward, and the City of Calgary.

Going forward I believe that if secondary suites are allowed, there must be several measures in place so that the surrounding neighbourhoods are not negatively impacted, such as;

There must be an effective method to notify the homeowners and resident in the affected neighbourhood
There must be an opportunity for concerned neighbours to appeal the secondary suite application.
The homeowner must live on-site
Building code and fire code requirements must be met
Dedicated parking must be available off road

Original Blog Entry

The issue of Secondary Suites will be coming to committee this week (February 16, 2011). In preparation for the meeting, I have included a map of Calgary which shows all residential areas in Calgary (both single and low/medium density multi-unit) that either allow Secondary Suites as discretionary uses (green) or do not allow secondary suites (red).

Closer view of Ward 12

Approximately 40% of Ward 12 falls into the red, or portion that does not allow secondary suites, while close to 60% of Ward 12 is currently zoned to allow the option (green).

This would include the areas of Douglasglen, Douglasdale and McKenzie Lake.

Committee, and then Council, will discuss the potential of allowing secondary suites in the areas that are currently marked in red.

Some of the questions being posed are:

Should secondary suites be allowed at all or should they be allowed on a case by case basis?
What would the process be to approve new secondary suites in Calgary?
What are some of the benefits and drawbacks of allowing secondary suites in communities?

I would appreciate your feedback on how the residents of Ward 12 feel about this issue. Please email your comments to me at eaward12@calgary.ca (please include the name of the community you live in as well as any contact information you can provide).

Thank you

Ward 12 Update

2011-02-08T10:49:00.000-07:00

February 2011

January saw the issue of the future Southeast LRT come back to Council. In November of 2010, a newly elected Council was asked to decide the fate of close to $1 billion of provincial and city funds (that were to be dedicated to a Southeast LRT plan.

The options we were asked to consider, after only having been in office for less than a month, were options that I did not feel comfortable agreeing to.

After careful deliberations with several Aldermen, I put forward a motion to delay the decision on the future of the LRT until Council could ask questions of the plan and get clear and concise answers on what the money would be used for.

After several rounds of meetings I felt that there was a clear set of guidelines given to Administration to put forward a report to Council.

It is my hope, and an issue that I campaigned heavily on, that there will soon be a direct link from the site of the new South Calgary Health Centre to downtown.

The report is expected to come back in mid-January, after this update will have been sent to press. I hope to have a result to report in the March update; however, for the latest news on Ward 12, including the Southeast LRT you can visit my website at the http://shanekeating.blogspot.com/.

I welcome your feedback, questions or comments. Please feel free to contact me through one of the following ways.

Phone: 403-268-2478
Email: eaward12@calgary.ca
Twitter: @CouncillorKeats
Facebook: Shane Keating
Web: http://shanekeating.blogspot.com/

City Councillors, a Non-Issue That Becomes an Issue Every Year.

2010-12-08T11:33:00.000-07:00

For years, Calgary’s elected officials have been regarded as Alderman, a term not commonly used in Canada. In fact Calgary is one of the only major Canadian cities that identify its elected officials as Aldermen.

While the rest of Canada has adjusted with the times, referring to their elected officials as Councillors, Calgary’s City Council has held on to a tradition that dates back to the 19th Century.

Though the issue of gender equality continues to be the lightning rod that keeps this debate raging, it is also an issue of political equality. The Alberta Municipalities Act states that municipalities are governed by a council, and that “a councillor is to have the title ‘councillor’ and a chief elected official that of ‘chief elected official’ unless the council directs that another title appropriate to the office be used.”

“Many comments I have received, read and heard from Calgarians claim that changing the title from Alderman to Councillor is a non-issue. I wholly agree, this is a non-issue; a non-issue that becomes an issue every year.

If this truly is a non-issue and is something already widely recognized by the Alberta Municipalities Act, and a vast majority of Canadian municipalities, then let’s change the title once and for all so it becomes a part of our history, not next year’s agenda.”

Costs to the taxpayers will be minimal as the change, if approved by council, will coincide with the next municipal election in 2013.

Ward 12 Update - December 2010

2010-12-08T09:37:00.000-07:00

I would like to take an opportunity to thank residents Ward 12 for hiring me to represent you in council for the next three years.

Your overwhelming support has strengthened my resolve to make the necessary changes that Calgarians are demanding, and ask the hard questions of what we can do differently and how we can manage this great city in the interests of our citizens.

Concerns that affect Ward 12, such as bringing the LRT to the southeast and the development of recreation facilities in Seton, and throughout southeast Calgary, will become front and center during my term as alderman. These are issues that I will not lose sight of.

Transparency, where and how we spend your tax dollars, transportation and growth are key concerns to many Calgarians and these are issues that concern me as both an Alderman and resident of Ward 12 as well.

I will be an active participant for the ward, and for the city, on four committees:
· Standing Policy Committee – Community & Protective Services (Vice-Chair)
· Standing Policy Committee – Land Use Planning & Transportation
· Land & Asset Strategy Committee
· Inter-Municipal Committee – Rocky-View

With the holiday season just weeks away, I wish each of you all the best and I look forward to hearing your thoughts, concerns and questions regarding these and other issues that concern you.

Alderman Shane Keating
Phone: 403-268-2478
Email: eaward12@calgary.ca
Twitter: @shanekeatingald